Baroque1657
Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window
Johannes Vermeer
Curator's Eye
"A young woman in profile, bathed in a boreal clarity, reads a letter before an open window. The recent revelation of a painting-within-a-painting depicting Cupid transforms the interpretation of the work from a simple genre scene into a complex allegory of romantic fidelity."
An absolute masterpiece of Vermeer's early maturity, this canvas marks a radical revolution in the art of the Sphinx of Delft: the invention of a silent interior space where light, treated as an almost divine substance, becomes the vehicle for a cryptic psychological narrative and a profound meditation on sincere love.
Analysis
Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window (c. 1657-1659) marks the birth of the Vermeer style. During this period, the artist broke away from the influence of the Utrecht Caravaggisti and the brothel scenes of his youth to explore the domestic intimacy of the Dutch bourgeoisie. This work reflects the rise of epistolary culture in the 17th-century United Provinces, where the letter became the bridge between a closed private space and the outside world. Vermeer uses the pointillé technique here to sublimate textures, particularly on the Turkish carpet and the porcelain, creating a luminous vibration that seems to suspend time.
The psychological analysis of the work is centered on the concept of absorption. The young woman is so completely immersed in her reading that she seems to belong to another temporal dimension. Her reflection in the window panes, slightly distorted and melancholic, acts as a double of her consciousness, revealing to the viewer an emotion that her profile face attempts to contain. This reflection device is not merely an optical feat but a metaphor for the introspection and inner dialogue sparked by reading an intimate missive.
The symbolic context was radically overturned by the 2021 restoration. The uncovering of the large Cupid on the back wall changes everything: this mythological character, inspired by an emblem by Otto van Veen, tramples on masks, signifying that "perfect love rejects deceit." The letter is therefore not evidence of a guilty liaison, but of an honest and faithful love. Vermeer thus transforms an observation of daily life into a Neoplatonic moral lesson on the truth of feelings, where the clarity of the external light symbolizes the clarity of the soul.
Technically, Vermeer deploys a palette of incredible richness. The massive use of natural ultramarine (lapis lazuli), the most expensive pigment of the time, for the curtain and clothing elements, testifies to a high-ranking commission. The light does not merely illuminate objects; it sculpts them, creating value contrasts that give an almost three-dimensional depth to the scene. Vermeer plays with textures, contrasting the matteness of the wall with the glassy brilliance of the window and the woolly softness of the carpet, offering a total sensory experience.
Finally, the work embodies Vermeer's spatial mastery. By placing a table loaded with fruit and a trompe-l'œil curtain in the foreground, he creates a barrier between the viewer and the reader. This distance establishes a sense of respect and discreet voyeurism. We are not invited to enter the room, but to observe, through a lifted veil, a moment of absolute grace. It is this ability to transform the mundane into the sacred that places Vermeer at the pinnacle of European genre painting, making every detail a metaphysical enigma.
The most resounding secret in recent art history concerns the "Hidden Cupid." For over two centuries, the wall behind the young woman was blank, covered with a greyish paint thought to be by Vermeer's hand. It was only in 2017 that X-ray fluorescence and microscopy analysis proved that this overpainting was applied long after the artist's death, likely to make the painting more "sober" for sale. The decision to remove this layer in 2021 was a seismic event, revealing a god of love that now occupies nearly a third of the wall, radically altering the chromatic balance and hidden meaning of the canvas.
Another mystery lies in the optical accuracy of the scene. Historians suspect Vermeer used a camera obscura to achieve this precision in reflections and the particular diffusion of light in "circles of confusion." However, studies have shown that the reflection of the face in the glass is physically impossible relative to the young woman's angle. Vermeer thus knowingly cheated with the laws of physics to heighten the poetic and symbolic effect of the double, proving that his genius went beyond mere mechanical reproduction of reality to serve a superior artistic vision.
The painting's provenance is also marked by fascinating historical errors. When it was purchased for the collection of the Elector of Saxony in 1742, the work was attributed to Rembrandt, as Vermeer's name had fallen into total oblivion. Later, it was even attributed to Pieter de Hooch. It was not until the mid-19th century that critic Théophile Thoré-Bürger identified Vermeer's unique "manner." During WWII, the painting was hidden in a tunnel to escape Allied bombs, before being taken as a war trophy by the Soviets to Moscow, only returning to Dresden in 1955.
Finally, the still life in the foreground holds its own botanical and symbolic secrets. The Saxon (or Chinese) porcelain dish contains peaches and apples, some of which are spoiled or cut. In Dutch iconography, these fruits often refer to Eve's original sin, but here, their proximity to the letter and Cupid suggests rather the fragility of earthly life and carnal pleasures compared to the permanence of spiritual love. The technique used to render the shine of the porcelain, using small touches of pure lead white, remains one of the most cited examples of the Delft master's technical virtuosity.
Join Premium.
UnlockQuiz
What element hidden by Vermeer under a layer of paint was revealed by a recent restoration?
Discover
